After another Portuguese-in-Amsterdam dinner last night, involving some of my favorite former Lisbonites turned Amsterdamers, I decided 1 in the morning was a goodtime to finally sit and watch the Constant Gardener. Now I wouldn’t normally talk about films on the blog, unless they really deserve to be spoken about… and this little picture caught my eye.
If many of you haven’t heard of it, It’s not very surprising, since it tackles the very un-hip themes of development, AIDs in Africa, diplomacy, big pharma, and white guilt. I’m sure Howard isn’t spending much time on those with all his free speech bullshit rhetoric. But the Constant Gardener, in all it’s imperfection, does a decent job of walking the line between increasing awareness about the health crises in Africa, criticizing how the west behaves towards those countries, and just telling a love story. Not great on either of these, mind you, but again – a good effort.
Surprisingly, what the film really made me think about was what I will call “white guilt.” What does this term mean to you? When I say white guilt, I’m thinking of the feeling by individuals from wealthy nations primarily in Europe and North America, who feel guilty about the incalculable amout of sufferring going on outside their country, and perhaps to their benefit. Sometimes this guilt leads them to act, by donating money or even becoming an aid-worker themselves.
In my daily routine at the university fishtank, I believe I’ve seen something like white guilt. Young men and women show up to persue their graduate degrees, but more importantly, they arrive determined to go “work in Africa.” Be they Canadian, American, German, Swedish, Dutch, French, Portuguese…. I’ve seen it all. I’ve looked into the eyes of young and inexperienced people and seen this look of duty; that their calling lies in the sufferring of the poor nations of the world. It is both impressive and bizarre- just considering how they arrive at this feeling, or why, or if they are even capable of making a difference. Sometimes, I admit, I even think they are full of shit, trying to fill some void or emotional short-coming with what sounds like a noble cause. That’s not to say they don’t go on to do great things – they do. But is the world getting better because of it? – that part is hard to see from where I sit in my comfy chair.
I bet the Lounge Chicken would be a good guy to ask about all this. I smell a show topic.
AudioCommunique #96(mp3)
But nevermind that. I’m in Brussels doing a post-christmas visit, which means I’ve acquired some lovely and practical gifts, and I get to run around discussing important issues in French most of the day. – Mais di donc! – So instead of writing any further, I shall present to you a series of links that have somehow instersected with my offline and online life:
>I’ve been looking over the numbers, and worldwide, especially in China and the US, coal is growing and growing. Seems so strange to look at the year – 2006 – and then look at the fact that modern nations still use coal, despite the extreme air pollution, the mercury that contaminates most everything in the area of a plant, and the extremely dangerous conditions that miners work in. Is this the modern answer for a modern world? Seems more like 
The same feelings haunts me in Europa as I look at the dismantling of those grand ol social systems. For my entire brief adult life they’ve been privatizing, cutting, selling off, converting, or reversing. I hate most of the words, especially when they refer to this great health system, or rail system, or social security. Of course, I never lived during those days, so I live off the second hand stories, and whether they’re accurate or not, I get starry-eyed and daydream of what it would be like to live in old Europe when social services were operating at full speed with the full support if their countries.