<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antarctic Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenreporter.org/2008/01/antarctic-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenreporter.org/2008/01/antarctic-research/</link>
	<description>Under-reported news by a Portuguese-American, activist-journalist based in Amsterdam.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anno Nymize</title>
		<link>http://citizenreporter.org/2008/01/antarctic-research/comment-page-1/#comment-162012</link>
		<dc:creator>Anno Nymize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicyclemark.org/blog/2008/01/antarctic-research/#comment-162012</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your talk on YeastRadio.com. I like hearing other nations debating about there concerns, because sooner or later we will have the same discussion over here, although most of the time I don&#039;t understand there particular worries. Quite often I get the feeling that most topics they are speaking about, are artificially created by some spokesperson on the government to keep a nonrelevant and trivial talk going on and prevent the masses from getting into a more serious discussion. Yeah, nothing all of you are already aware of.

However, I just forgot to hand you this link in the chat. Personally I have never heart about this problem before, but I believe it is doing a good neck-and-neck race with your latest &quot;Antarctic Research&quot;:

&quot;The world&#039;s rubbish dump: a garbage tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan&quot; http://tinyurl.com/2xx234</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your talk on YeastRadio.com. I like hearing other nations debating about there concerns, because sooner or later we will have the same discussion over here, although most of the time I don&#8217;t understand there particular worries. Quite often I get the feeling that most topics they are speaking about, are artificially created by some spokesperson on the government to keep a nonrelevant and trivial talk going on and prevent the masses from getting into a more serious discussion. Yeah, nothing all of you are already aware of.</p>
<p>However, I just forgot to hand you this link in the chat. Personally I have never heart about this problem before, but I believe it is doing a good neck-and-neck race with your latest &#8220;Antarctic Research&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;The world&#8217;s rubbish dump: a garbage tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan&#8221; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2xx234" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2xx234</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Todd</title>
		<link>http://citizenreporter.org/2008/01/antarctic-research/comment-page-1/#comment-161883</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicyclemark.org/blog/2008/01/antarctic-research/#comment-161883</guid>
		<description>In case you miss it, there was a debate in the General Assembly last month on the 25th anniversary of the Law of the Sea.

http://www.undemocracy.com/generalassembly_62/meeting_64#pg001-bk02

The debate isn&#039;t all that interesting, but they are presenting a series of reports (eg A/62/66 and A/62/66/Add.1) which contain a summary of the state of play.  Let me know the codes of any documents you can&#039;t follow through in those texts.

There appears to be a disproportionate amount of material on &quot;marine genetic resources&quot;, which is new to me.  Someone else can work out whether this is a red herring (eg you won&#039;t find much mention of the arctic cold war -- the UN is very good at knowing what it&#039;s not supposed to talk about), or it&#039;s important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you miss it, there was a debate in the General Assembly last month on the 25th anniversary of the Law of the Sea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.undemocracy.com/generalassembly_62/meeting_64#pg001-bk02" rel="nofollow">http://www.undemocracy.com/generalassembly_62/meeting_64#pg001-bk02</a></p>
<p>The debate isn&#8217;t all that interesting, but they are presenting a series of reports (eg A/62/66 and A/62/66/Add.1) which contain a summary of the state of play.  Let me know the codes of any documents you can&#8217;t follow through in those texts.</p>
<p>There appears to be a disproportionate amount of material on &#8220;marine genetic resources&#8221;, which is new to me.  Someone else can work out whether this is a red herring (eg you won&#8217;t find much mention of the arctic cold war &#8212; the UN is very good at knowing what it&#8217;s not supposed to talk about), or it&#8217;s important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

